Babylon license key

January 3, 2022 / Rating: 4.5 / Views: 506

Gallery of Images "Babylon license key" (41 pics):

Babylon license key

Babylon Timeline. Search Results. 2350 BCE. First code of laws by Urukagina, king of Lagash. c. 2000 BCE. Babylon controls Fertile Crescent. 1894 BCE. Amorite dynasty established in Babylon. 1795 BCE - 1750 BCE. Reign of Hammurabi, king of Babylon. c. 1792 BCE. King Hammurabi builds walls of Babylon. 1787 BCE. Hammurabi of Babylon conquers Uruk and

Babylon license key
Public Citizen has reviewed and published the secret contracts between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement” without the written consent of the company. The only difference is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties October 26, 2021, the U. Food and Drug Administration voted to extend the emergency use of Pfizer’s COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11. Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries The contracts also give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. The contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer, and in virtually all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests come first Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, have put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings The contracts not only secure Pfizer’s intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility onto the government purchasers. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U. Experts warn this is reckless and unnecessary, and will do far more harm than good, as COVID-19 poses no risk to young children that Pfizer was demanding countries put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation. These contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer. While at least two countries, Argentina and Brazil, initially rejected the demands, calling them abusive, many others accepted Pfizer’s terms from the start. In virtually all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests come first. Public Citizen has now reviewed and published the secret contracts between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U. Pfizer Is Calling the Shots Public Citizen points out six ways in which nations are allowing Pfizer to call the shots. For example, Albania, Brazil and Colombia have handed over unilateral authority to the company for the delivery schedule and other key decisions. As reported by Public Citizen: “As a condition to entering into the agreement, the Colombian government is required to ‘demonstrate, in a manner satisfactory to Suppliers, that Suppliers and their affiliates will have adequate protection, as determined in Suppliers’ sole discretion’ … Colombia is required to certify to Pfizer the value of the contingent obligations (i.e., potential future liability), and to start appropriating funds to cover the contingent obligations, according to a contribution program.” Pfizer also maintains tight control over vaccine supplies, and dictates who can buy their vaccine, when, and who can give and receive vaccine donations. If there are shortages, Pfizer decides which countries get priority. For example, if Brazil were to accept vaccine donations from another country without Pfizer’s approval, the company can terminate the contract and force Brazil to pay the full prize for all remaining contracted doses. Meanwhile, Pfizer incurs no penalty if its delivery is late, even if it’s so late that the shots are no longer needed. Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, also ended up agreeing to Pfizer’s demand to put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings. In short, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer will be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it, so the company won’t lose a dime if its COVID shot injures people — even if those injuries are the result of negligent company practices, fraud or malice! At the same time, government purchasers must acknowledge that the effectiveness and safety of the shots are completely unknown. This is the ultimate corporate maleficence, using their leverage to force the kill shot down these countries’ throats and avoiding any personal responsibility for damages. Secret Arbitration The contracts also dictate how contractual disputes will be settled. As reported by Public Citizen: “What happens if the United Kingdom cannot resolve a contractual dispute with Pfizer? A secret panel of three private arbitrators — not a U. K court — is empowered under the contract to make the final decision. The arbitration is conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Both parties are required to keep everything secret: ‘The Parties agree to keep confidential the existence of the arbitration, the arbitral proceedings, the submissions made by the Parties and the decisions made by the arbitral tribunal, including its awards, except as required by Law and to the extent not already in the public domain.’ The Albania draft contract and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, and Peru agreements require the governments to go further, with contractual disputes subject to ICC arbitration applying New York law. While ICC arbitration involving states is not uncommon, disputes involving high-income countries and/or pharmaceuticals appear to be relatively rare … Private arbitration reflects an imbalance of power. It allows pharmaceutical corporations like Pfizer to bypass domestic legal processes. This consolidates corporate power and undermines the rule of law.” Pfizer Secured Intellectual Property Rights Amazingly, the contracts not only secure Pfizer’s intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility away from Pfizer onto the government purchasers! What this means is that Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries. “For example, if another vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian government to foot the bill,” Public Citizen writes. “Pfizer also explicitly says that it does not guarantee that its product does not violate third-party IP, or that it needs additional licenses. Pfizer takes no responsibility in these contracts for its potential infringement of intellectual property. In a sense, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. But internationally, Pfizer is fighting similar efforts to waive IP barriers for all manufacturers.” Pfizer Given Right to Silence Government Perhaps most egregious of all, some of the contracts give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement” without the written consent of the company. The gag order also includes commenting on the government’s relationship with Pfizer in general. The only difference, Public Citizen notes, is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U. Pfizer Can Prevent Use of Other Remedies Equally shocking, though, is that countries are forced to follow through on their vaccine orders even if other drugs or treatments emerge that can prevent, treat or cure COVID-19. Is it any wonder, then, that governments around the world have suppressed the use of drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin? If these drugs were allowed to be used and could be proven to work, the COVID injections would be completely unnecessary, yet governments are on the hook for hundreds of millions of doses. While COVID-19 vaccines are “free” to receive in the U. S., they’re being paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.50 per dose. and the EU, Pfizer is said to have given a price break to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine. In Albania, the cost of each dose is $12, and in the EU, $14.70. Pfizer — Master of Disaster Profiteering As noted Public Citizen, Pfizer is being allowed to profit from this self-inflicted global disaster in unprecedented ways. In many instances, a nation’s laws will not apply to Pfizer. These secret contracts grant Pfizer total control over its product and ensures full payment, regardless of whether the shots are needed or usable, while simultaneously eliminating all liability. In short, Pfizer wins, no matter what the outcome of the vaccination campaign might be. At the same time, Pfizer is also controlling media through its advertising dollars. As you’ve probably realized by now, media companies in most instances will not report on anything that might jeopardize the profits of its advertisers. As illustrated in the short video above, it couldn’t be more obvious that Pfizer is bankrolling the media, which in turn will refuse to bite the hand that feeds it. You can see the wide spectrum of media programming being sponsored by Pfizer, including “Nightline,” “Making a Difference,” “CNN Tonight,” “Early Start,” “Erin Burnett Out Front,” “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” “CBS Sports,” “Meet the Press,” “CBS This Morning” and “60 Minutes.” Pfizer Study Shows Increased Mortality Watch the video here. The terms of these contracts are all the more disturbing when you consider how dangerous the Pfizer shot is turning out to be. No wonder the company refused to accept any liability. As shown in the video above, Episode 3 in “The False Narrative Takedown Series” showed the shots increased all-cause mortality. More people actually died in the treatment group than in the placebo group. According to Pfizer’s own data, one COVID death per 20,000 fully vaccinated individuals is prevented. That means 10,000 lives are saved if 200 million are fully vaccinated. This is the other side of the equation that simply demands to be analyzed before any governmental authority can make a decision as to whether the mass vaccination campaign is of benefit or not. Here, we find that Pfizer’s data show the shots are actually killing more than they save. To look at this information yourself, click on “Supplementary Material” on the right-hand side of the paper, then, beside Supplementary Appendix, click on supplements/261159 and scroll down to page 12, Table S4. In the vaccine group, 15 died; in the placebo group 14 died. Two people died from COVID-19 in the placebo group, while only one died from COVID pneumonia in the vaccine group. That’s how you get a net false positive impact — one life is spared from COVID. However, the all-cause mortality was actually higher in the vaccine group (15, compared to 14). Other investigations using different data strongly suggest the net effect is profoundly negative, and the shots are doing FAR more harm than good. So, while the shots saved one person from dying from COVID, they also killed one extra person. We Face Looming Vaccine-Induced Public Health Catastrophe For this, Kirsch cites a paper by Dr. Bart Classen, published in the August 2021 issue of the journal Trends in Internal Medicine. Classen points out that Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are all using a “dangerously misleading” clinical trial design. The problem is that they’re all using a surrogate endpoint for health, namely “severe infections with COVID-19.” Disease specific primary endpoints are no longer used in many fields of medicine, for the fact that it can hide problems. If a person dies from the treatment or is severely injured by it, even if the treatment helped block the progression of the disease they’re being treated for, the end result is still a negative one. For this reason, the appropriate endpoint that should be used is all-cause mortality and morbidity. When Classen reexamined the clinical trial data from all three manufacturers using all-cause severe morbidity as the endpoint, a disturbing picture emerged. it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe. Bart Classen As explained by Classen in his paper, “US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, ‘All Cause Severe Morbidity’”: “‘All-cause severe morbidity’ in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statistically significant increase in ‘all-cause severe morbidity’ in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 more severe events than the control group. The Pfizer data was grossly incomplete but data provided showed the vaccination group suffered 90 more severe events than the control group, when only including ‘unsolicited’ adverse events. regulators were tied to lower non-COVID death rates, though the difference in mortality among people who took Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine was slightly smaller than for recipients of Pfizer or Moderna’s vaccines … The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 more severe events than the control group. This result suggests the vaccines don’t increase a patient’s risk of death, which ‘reinforces the safety profile of currently approved COVID-19 vaccines,’ the study said.” FDA Approves Jab for Young Children FDA Voting Member: “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.” 🤷‍♂️ Video HT @politicalwilli pic.twitter.com/OMAph49Qow — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 26, 2021 This despite acknowledging they have no idea what the long-term risk to children might be. These findings contrast the manufacturers’ inappropriate surrogate endpoints: Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 cases of severe COVID-19 requiring medical attention out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized. As noted by one voting member, “We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.” All we have at present is two Pfizer trials, one in which 5- to 11-year-olds were followed for two months and another with just six weeks of follow-up. Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Both were too small to detect potential risks such as myocarditis. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.” To make the above numbers more clear and obvious, here are the prevention stats in percentages: CDC Claims COVID Shots Lower All-Cause Mortality Despite all of that, the U. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now claims Americans “vaccinated” against COVID-19 have lower all-cause mortality rates. That won’t be studied until AFTER the shot is authorized for children. As reported by The Defender: “Experts raised concerns over the lack of safety and efficacy data presented by Pfizer for use of its COVID vaccine in younger children, and they pointed to increasing safety signals based on reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). They also questioned the need to vaccinate children — whose risk of dying from COVID is “almost nil” — at all. Meryl Nass, member of the Children’s Health Defense Scientific Advisory Panel, Pfizer once again did not use all of the children who participated in the trial in their safety study. ‘Three thousand children received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, but only 750 children were selectively included in the company’s safety analysis,’ Nass said. ‘Studies in the 5-11 age group are essentially the same as the 12-15 group — in other words, equally brief and unsatisfying, with inadequate safety data and efficacy data, with no strong support for why this type of immuno-bridging analysis is sufficient … All serious adverse events were considered unrelated to the vaccine’ … Jessica Rose, viral immunologist and biologist, told the panel EUA of biological agents requires the existence of an emergency and the nonexistence of alternate treatment. ‘There is no emergency and COVID-19 is exceedingly treatable,’ Rose said. In a peer-reviewed study co-authored by Rose, myocarditis rates were significantly higher in people 13 to 23 years old within eight weeks of the COVID vaccine rollout. In 12- to15-year-olds, Rose said, reported cases of myocarditis were 19 times higher than background rates … Rose said tens of thousands of reports have been submitted to VAERS for children ages 0 to 18. Rose explained: ‘In this age group, 60 children have died — 23 of them were less than 2 years old. It is disturbing to note that ‘product administered to patient of inappropriate age’ was filed 5,510 times in this age group. Two children were inappropriately injected, presumably by a trained medical professional, and subsequently died.’” During the meeting, Dr. Cody Meissner noted we don’t know whether the shot is safe for this age group, and the risk of COVID is extremely low. If the shot is authorized, mandates will likely follow, which would be “bad.” Paul Elias Alexander, Ph. D., a former assistant professor of evidence-based medicine and research methods, called the plan to vaccinate young children “absolutely reckless” and “dangerous based on lack of safety data and poor research methodology.” Meanwhile, data show not a single child has died from COVID-19 who did not have a serious underlying health condition. Alexander reviews a lot of that data in his article. Staggering Conflicts of Interest When you look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members In addition to that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is currently on Pfizer’s board of directors. Food and Drug Administration is burying data on children who were seriously injured in the vaccine trials. FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Children With these shots now being pushed on young children, it’s more imperative than ever to understand how data are being massaged and manipulated to support the ongoing lunacy. As reported by Aaron Siri on Substack: “Pfizer’s clinical trial for children aged 12-15 included only 1,131 children who were vaccinated and at least one of those children suffered a devastating, life-altering injury which, despite incontrovertible proof and the cries of both the victim and her parents, has not been appropriately acknowledged by Pfizer or the FDA. Putting aside that one serious injury in a small trial should alone raise blaring alarm bells, one must ask: what other serious adverse events have been hidden and ignored by regulators? ” Siri tells the story of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who along with her two brothers were enrolled by her parents in Pfizer’s clinical trial. That decision has changed the lives of the entire family, possibly forever. Within 24 hours of her second dose, Maddie suffered crippling pain and systemic injuries. Maddie is now wheelchair-bound and requires a feeding tube. Pfizer’s principal investigator initially claimed Maddie’s injuries were unrelated to the shot and treated her as a mental patient. Eventually, her injury was listed as “functional abdominal pain” in Pfizer’s report to the FDA. “For a virus that rarely harms children, the need to assure safety of the Covid-19 vaccine is high. It will not pick up anything but the most common adverse events. If what Maddie suffered will occur in 1/1,000 children, that would result in 75,000 children in this country suffering this serious injury. If it happens 1/10,000 children, that is 7,500 suffering this serious injury. It could be that the cure is worse than the disease. But that will only be known if there is a properly powered (a.k.a., sized) clinical trial with children,” Siri writes, adding that: “International scientists have declared that ‘inadequately powered studies should themselves be considered a breach of ethical standards.’ Without a clinical trial of sufficient size that reviews all potential adverse events, such as that experienced by Maddie, for a sufficient duration, this potentially catastrophic result will not be identified prior to authorization or licensure … The real lesson is not that pharmaceutical companies, or the FDA should act better or do a better job. The real lesson is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Preserving those rights to choose whether to get a medical product, without any government coercion, is the final and ultimate safeguard. Removing that right results in dangerous authoritarianism because just as the FDA will not admit to Maddie’s serious injury after having promoted this vaccine, politicians that mandate the vaccine will not want to later admit a mistake by repealing the mandate.” FDA Sued to Access COVID Jab Trial Data We’re now in a position where it’s near-impossible for many to refuse the COVID jab, and if injured, they cannot sue anyone for damages. Adding insult to injury, we don’t even have access to all the data governments are supposedly relying on to mandate these hazardous products. To address this last point, an organization called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is now suing The FDA denied the PHMPT request for expedited processing of its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the basis that no “imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual” existed. in an effort to ensure that the FDA acts in furtherance of its commitment to transparency, PHMPT seeks to obtain the data and information relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine. The importance of releasing to the public this information is also recognized under federal law which provides that: ‘After a license has been issued, the following data and information in the biological product file are immediately available for public disclosure unless extraordinary circumstances are shown: (1) All safety and effectiveness data and information. (2) A protocol for a test or study …’” ‘Just Say No’ to the COVID Shot While U. authorities are doing their best to hide incriminating data and manipulating the rest to show some sort of benefit, common sense, medical facts and available data all point in the opposite direction. It’s crystal clear to me that children do not need the COVID shot, as their risk of serious COVID-19 infection and death is virtually nonexistent. On the other hand, children are quite likely to be seriously injured by these injections. The reason you’re not getting the truth from the media is explained by Dr. In short, it’s a planned propaganda campaign — “the promotion of false information by the people in charge.” According to Mc Cullough, anyone under the age of 50 has a less than 1% chance of a bad outcome if they come down with COVID-19. part may be reproduced in any form without explicit written permission. Different types of Scaffolding used for various types of construction. The 8 types of scaffoldings are trestle, steel, patented, suspended, cantilever, single, double, kwikstage scaffolding etc. To understand these Scaffoldings completely lets first learn its definition and then the uses of various Type of Scaffoldings, and their uses. In this blog you’ll find the most important scaffolding types with their images and explanation. By understanding the meaning, usage, purpose and results of each type of Scaffolding. You can easily select the various types of Scaffolding required for your construction work. This is also helpful in creating a safer environment for construction workers. Keep yourself updated from latest article about most trending products and share your thoughts. Scaffolding is an impermanent structure that works as a platform for the workers to perform the construction works while supporting the original structure. The Scaffolding structure changes depending on the type of construction and its requirements. It is essential that the Scaffolding is made from high quality material because it provides support for construction workers and the construction material. Wood or Metal (like steel) is used to construct Scaffolding for better performance. As the name suggests, this type of Scaffolding is supported on tripod type movable ladders. This scaffolding type is used primarily in indoors, like for repairs or painting works. The usage of Trestle Scaffolding is limited to indoors as the height in this Scaffolding is up to 5 meters only. Following its name, this Scaffolding type is created using steel tubes set by couplers and it is easy to assemble as well as disintegrate. Steel Scaffolding comes with vast benefits, thus has higher cost but it does provide higher safety standards during construction. The structure provides strength, durability and is fire resistant. Despite the cost, it is one of the most popular Scaffolding today owing to its benefits. Steel Scaffolding is mainly used for outdoor construction and bigger structures. This type of Scaffolding is also made using steel however, these are readymade Scaffoldings and are fitted with special couplings and frames etc. The readymade Scaffoldings are available in market and are ready to use once bought. When using the Patented Scaffolding, the working platform is set on the brackets, these brackets can be adjusted to the required level may differ according to scaffolding type. Suspended Scaffolding is used for a variety of repair works as well as painting. Mainly used in painting as the platform is adjustable to desired length multiple times. Suspended Scaffolding is created using rope or chains tied to the platform for the construction worker, which is then hanged from the roof with the height adjusted at desired level. Also known as, Single Frame Scaffolding, Cantilever Scaffolding has limited usage and requires various checks before the installation. In this Scaffolding system, the standards are supported by a chain of needles that are pulled out from the holes in the wall. There is another type of Cantilever Scaffolding, in which instead of wall the needles are supported inside the floors through the double frame Scaffolding. One needs to be very carefully and follow all the required steps when installing the Cantilever Scaffolding. Given below are the scenarios in which this type of Scaffolding is recommended: One of the basic and oldest methods used in Construction, Single scaffolding is mainly used for brick masonry. This type of Scaffolding includes standards, putlogs, ledgers, which links to the wall at a distance of 1.2 meters approximately. In addition, Ledgers join the standards at a vertical distance of 1.2 to 1.5 meters while the distance between the standards is 2 to 2.5 meters. Putlogs fixed at a distance of 1.2 to 1.5 meters, but extracted from gap in the wall at the end of the ledger. All these technical calculations when followed by book keep the structure sturdy and offer desired support. Double Scaffolding also known as the Independent Scaffolding, is the type of Scaffolding that is used mainly for the stone masonry job. It is very difficult to make holes in the stone walls for supporting the putlogs, hence two scaffoldings together create a sturdy structure for construction work. While the first row is 20 to 30 cm away from the wall, the second one is erected 1 meter far from the first row. With the support of both frames then putlogs are positioned. Additional steps are taken to make the structure firmer by adding cross braces and rakers. The last but not the least in the list is the Kwikstage Scaffolding system. This Scaffolding is contrived from hardwearing galvanized steel and is admired for its easy installation. Effortless to assemble as well as disintegrate, it is used for both big and small construction works. Kwikstage Scaffolding can easily replace regular scaffold system and provide safer and strong platform to work. Created using a durable and safe interlocking system, the patented Kwikstage modular system is customizable to any desired height. We offer Australia Scaffolding and are one of the most admired manufactures of scaffolding. Through this article, we have tried our best to keep the definitions simple, while adding images that clarifies any remaining doubts. The variety of Scaffoldings described here are some of the most used and successful Scaffoldings used in Construction. By understanding the meaning and the use of different type of Scaffoldings, one can easily select the right Scaffolding for their construction work with complete safety.Hello all, Today, I got a strange Babylon message on my screen, that I have "overused" my Babylon license. I have installed it both on my desktop and my laptop. As they mention on their site, "Babylon licenses are sold per computer. A very common misconception is installing Babylon on two or more computers being used by the same owner. During the last month, Babylon went through an automatic Hello all, Today, I got a strange Babylon message on my screen, that I have "overused" my Babylon license. I have installed it both on my desktop and my laptop. As they mention on their site, "Babylon licenses are sold per computer. A very common misconception is installing Babylon on two or more computers being used by the same owner. During the last month, Babylon went through an automatic process of resetting overused licenses. When a license was monitored as being overused and blocked, a new license was created and sent to its owner's original Email address to replace the overused one. If your license was blocked, first check the Email account under which you purchased the related Babylon license, where you will find our letter containing the replacement license." I need to point out that I find their approach to be unreasonable, as it is well known that language professionals quite often use more than one computers, either for security - backup reasons or for mobility reasons. It is good to protect your copyright, but on more reasonable grounds. [Edited at 2008-12-04 GMT]I had the same problem, with regard to a perfectly valid license bought in March 2008. I was amazed by this attitude of a single-pc license. Almost all software products that I bought allow up to 3 computers (Norton, Office, Trados etc.), so why does Babylon behave in such a petty way? As a matter of principle, I refused to buy the 3-pc license for 70 dollars, and have the other pcs use freeware alternatives - hopefully Babylon should learn something from the dropping numbers I had the same problem, with regard to a perfectly valid license bought in March 2008. I was amazed by this attitude of a single-pc license. Almost all software products that I bought allow up to 3 computers (Norton, Office, Trados etc.), so why does Babylon behave in such a petty way? As a matter of principle, I refused to buy the 3-pc license for 70 dollars, and have the other pcs use freeware alternatives - hopefully Babylon should learn something from the dropping numbers of new customers/license renewals... Anyway, in this case you should reapply your existing key in order to continue using the existing license. Doron My license would work for a day or two after my first posting, but now it gives me the message that it has expired, and it prompts me to "buy a license at a discount"!!!!! I wouldn't buy another license for all the discounts in the world! I've already paid for a license and not even a year later I get this petty behaviour! Of course, nobody from Babylon has bothered to answer to my e-mails, in which I was asking for an explanation and for renewal of my license. All I My license would work for a day or two after my first posting, but now it gives me the message that it has expired, and it prompts me to "buy a license at a discount"!!!!! I wouldn't buy another license for all the discounts in the world! I've already paid for a license and not even a year later I get this petty behaviour! Of course, nobody from Babylon has bothered to answer to my e-mails, in which I was asking for an explanation and for renewal of my license. All I have to say is this: stay away from providers who abuse their clients' trust and treat them with such disregard. One of my premium dictionaries stopped working a few weeks ago, so I submitted a support request and got an answer within 3 days with a new license code for this premium dictionary (it was the Larousse Chambers ENFR). But now it is my main Babylon license which stopped working! Telling me it has expired when I had a permanent license, not a yearly subscription! This time, I first sent a email (about 10 days ago, still no answ Hi all, Same problem over here. One of my premium dictionaries stopped working a few weeks ago, so I submitted a support request and got an answer within 3 days with a new license code for this premium dictionary (it was the Larousse Chambers ENFR). But now it is my main Babylon license which stopped working! Telling me it has expired when I had a permanent license, not a yearly subscription! This time, I first sent a email (about 10 days ago, still no answer) through their web interface. Today I sent another one to one of the direct support emails I got a reply earlier. Whatever their new license agreement may say, I never had to accept such new arrangements. I think that having several of us having a collective action may have much more weight. Of course, over time (I'm using it since v4), the computer has changed, but so far, it has been only on a single one. I have had an email today - Christmas Day, no less - telling me I have a licence problem. I mean, Babylon is a great tool, but such behaviour will surely lead to their end if they continue this way. Just as you all, I was amazed to see such behaviour from an editor. This is after an episode a few months ago when I couldn't use the software for several weeks before they sorted it out. If they don't want to see people turn to illegal solutions, they will have to solve that, and quickly. It seems it also freaks out when you have several user accounts on your PC! Then I had more than one operating system on my computer so they counted that as multiple use. That's the only thing I can imagine happening here. Now I have replaced my computer and again they want me to buy another licence (at a discount, so generous of them) - no explanation or apology if they have made a mistake.... Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr I have had an email today - Christmas Day, no less - telling me I have a licence problem. This is after an episode a few months ago when I couldn't use the software for several weeks before they sorted it out. Then I had more than one operating system on my computer so they counted that as multiple use. Now I have replaced my computer and again they want me to buy another licence (at a discount, so generous of them) - no explanation or apology if they have made a mistake.... I love how they say on the support page that it's a "common misconception" - too right it's a misconception because Babylon don't ever explain that anywhere in the purchase process. And do they expect you to purchase multiple licences of the dictionaries as well....?!! They make my blood boil and I will NEVER buy from them again or recommend them. I also received E-mails about my "license problem". I have no license problem anymore, but Babylon have! There may be many reasons for using different PC's, or different user accounts on the same PC, but rules are rules you know. I just have to accept that they managed to grab some of my money, but they will not get another chance. If I accept this robbery , what will then come next ? And what are they actually monitoring on my computers ? I will learn gr I also received E-mails about my "license problem". I have no license problem anymore, but Babylon have! There may be many reasons for using different PC's, or different user accounts on the same PC, but rules are rules you know. I just have to accept that they managed to grab some of my money, but they will not get another chance. If I accept this robbery , what will then come next ? And what are they actually monitoring on my computers ? I'm almost halfway through my αλφαβητάριο (ABC book) and will make my way through it, Babylon or not. Spending more time in Crete may be the answer, even if it is at the other end of Europe. If the license rules allow me to install Babylon on one single computer, can I then make this computer available to all of you through Internet desktop sharing ? It's definitely more fun and the crime rate is much lower there than on the Internet. Ottar Friis wrote: I also received E-mails about my "license problem". I have no license problem anymore, but Babylon have! There may be many reasons for using different PC's, or different user accounts on the same PC, but rules are rules you know. I just have to accept that they managed to grab some of my money, but they will not get another chance. I submitted a support request and did not get any answer. If I accept this robbery , what will then come next ? And what are they actually monitoring on my computers ? I'm almost halfway through my αλφαβητάριο (ABC book) and will make my way through it, Babylon or not. ) Product Details: ========================================== Product Name Babylon 7 Britannica Special 20% offer *****License Period -- ******* (NO PERIOD WHATSOEVER!!! Inés..that their emails and screens nagging you about your "compliance problem" always direct you to the store to buy another licence. Spending more time in Crete may be the answer, even if it is at the other end of Europe. If the license rules allow me to install Babylon on one single computer, can I then make this computer available to all of you through Internet desktop sharing ? I have the same problem: I had a perfectly valid license bought in October 2007. ) Quantity 1 Price(USD) 79 Sub Total(USD) 79 Product Details: ========================================== Product Name Backup CD Shipping License Period CD Quantity 1 Price(USD) 14.9 Sub Total(USD) 15 ========================================== ========================================== Grand Total (USD): 94 I cannot use it now. There is not the slightest recognition that whatever system they are using to monitor you could be mistaken.... It's definitely more fun and the crime rate is much lower there than on the Internet. Denis HAY wrote: I think that having several of us having a collective action may have much more weight. I mean, Babylon is a great tool, but such behaviour will surely lead to their end if they continue this way. Dear colleagues, as this sofware was recently advertised on Pro Z.com, I notified the Staff on the matter- I hope they have some contact details of the manufacturers and will inform them on this thread. Uldis Thank you very much, Uldis, for letting us know. It is great to know that Proz is supporting us at matters like this. I remembered reading about Babylon at Proz.com, tried to find it but all to no avail. It’s shameful the way Babylon treats his long time customers. I'm sure we all appreciate the support, no matter what the result will be. Uldis Liepkalns wrote: Dear colleagues, as this sofware was recently advertised on Pro Z.com, I notified the Staff on the matter- I hope they have some contact details of the manufacturers and will inform them on this thread. Inés Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business. More info »You've never met a CAT tool this clever! Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer. Accept jobs from clients who use SDL Trados, Memo Q, Wordfast & major CAT tools. Download and start using Cafe Tran Espresso -- for free Buy now!Different types of Scaffolding used for various types of construction. The 8 types of scaffoldings are trestle, steel, patented, suspended, cantilever, single, double, kwikstage scaffolding etc. To understand these Scaffoldings completely lets first learn its definition and then the uses of various Type of Scaffoldings, and their uses. In this blog you’ll find the most important scaffolding types with their images and explanation. By understanding the meaning, usage, purpose and results of each type of Scaffolding. You can easily select the various types of Scaffolding required for your construction work. This is also helpful in creating a safer environment for construction workers. Keep yourself updated from latest article about most trending products and share your thoughts.In order to pull all the various parts of Babylonstoren together as one, we rely heavily on a stellar team of receptionists, housekeepers, chefs, gardeners, therapists, horticulturists, managers and winemakers to make it all happen.Babylonstoren has many exciting employment opportunities, and so if you are passionate about your career and enthusiastic about the possibility of working for us, please send your CV to [email protected] with the position your are applying for in the subject line.This is a great opportunity to join the dynamic E-commerce team at Babylonstoren and to help us grow and improve our supply chain and increase our stock availability.Our team is driven, takes initiative and is always looking for new and better ways to do things, and so should you.

2017-2018 © alloverlimo.us
Sitemap